Bush’s Lying Speech 2
Here’s Fred Kaplan’s take over at Slate Magazine:Bush’s appalling Iraq speech
That about says it.
Is Bush a liar or just delusional?
What a choice.
Here’s Fred Kaplan’s take over at Slate Magazine:Bush’s appalling Iraq speech
That about says it.
Is Bush a liar or just delusional?
What a choice.
The Associated Press did this quick fact check on Bush’s more egregious lies last night: A look at the facts behind Bush’s speech I came across the list at Talking Points memo this morning.
Is there no one who can shut this fool up? Does he honestly think we care any more about what he says? He has lived in a world of spin since he launched, totally unprovoked, his war on Iraq. His personal crusade. His dangerous lunacy just astounds me. His total lack of honesty, courage, mental capacity … anything at all. He is a shambolic mess and he’s so indifferent to his country that he simply doesn’t care anymore about what we all think. He just wants to hang in there and get out of the White House without having to admit that not one of his [by then] eight years in office has produced even one wit of substance.
He is vapid.
He is venal.
He is a danger to America.
And he continues to lie. The most amusing lie is about the 35 coalition members who are “standing by America”. I suppose that includes the one officer from Iceland who is reportedly going home soon. Or the one from Canada. Or the one from New Zealand. Oh, and does it include that mighty army of Spain’s who’s contribution is actually to train Iraqis in Spain … all twenty-five of them? OK so maybe if you do the contorted Bushie math you can come up with about 30 countries. But no one seems to be able to list them all. And does that guy from Iceland really make such a diffrence we should wax lyrical about his contribution to the occupation?
Didn’t think so.
No wonder no one takes Bush seriously. He should just go back to his bunker and hope no one finds him. He deserves … well you figure it out!
Bush is hitting new lows in his venal, spineless and blatant attempt to avoid taking responsibility for the destruction he has wrought. The weak reports this week by Crocker and Petraeus were the best the Bush regime can offer as it slinks sulkily into history. Sidney Blumenthal hits the nail on the head with this Salon piece: How Bush is trying to save face in Iraq
Pathetic. Bush continues to astound me with his weakness and lack of candor. He simply cannot face reality. His history of lies and misdirections has begun to unravel in the public’s mind – his popularity is so low, and his relevance has never been less – but apparently he still clings, childlike, to them. As he famously told the Australians on his visit there just last week: “We’re kicking ass in Iraq”. Yea. Right.
Somewhere in his juvenile mind Bush seems to think that his role is to be a cheerleader: someone who keeps the smile on and talks up the situation so as to boost the flagging spirits of those around him. He likes to think of himself as a Churchillain war leader. Instead he’s a parody of a spoilt child who brattily can’t understand why people don’t like him after he’s beaten them up on the school playground. He’s used to being bailed out, not having his buddies like Rove and Gonzales, bail out.
And he couldn’t be less Churchillian if he tried: Churchill relished a fight, he went off to war in his youth to experience it. He didn’t duck national service like Bush and Cheney did, he sought it out. When he rose to power he told the story straight: this is tough and will demand sacrifice on the part of everyone not just the army. He walked the bombed out streets and refused to leave London even as it was being bombed daily. Bush has done the exact opposite: he is furtive, weak, afraid to ask for sacrifice, afraid to stand in the danger zone, afraid to deliver a rallying cry, afraid to muster the necessary resources, and now afraid to tell the truth.
Liars like Bush are generally afraid to face up to reality themselves. Usually that’s a personal problem not a national disaster. Maybe it was inevitable that the Bush family’s pandering to its spoiled brat son should have become a national curse: so much of their fortune is tied up in the Middle East and Bush senior’s only great achievement was the Gulf War victory. Whatever the curious dynamics of the aristocratic Bush family were they produced a weak liar in this president. And he’s now bent on ruining us all further so as to “save face”.
If he weren’t trashing the country Bush would be merely a pathetic rich boy, a family embarrassment, and a footnote in a a series of failed projects. As it is he’s president: still a pathetic rich boy, but a national embarrassment, and a blot on national history.
Well at long last we’ve had the Petraeus report that Bush has been telling us all along will determine his policy for the next year. My conclusion? It was a total waste of time. Newsweek has a good angle on it here: Hirsh: Rating Petraeus’s Report to the Hill
The real problem is that the general and Bush both want the same thing: delay. The general’s reputation is on the line and apparently he doesn’t mind playing politics to keep his head. I am sure he remembers what happened to all the other generals who stood up to Bush: they’re all fired. No one wants to tell the truth. They cook up numbers to try to make things look better when we can all see quite plainly that things are nowhere near settled.
The whole [point of the “surge” was not to produce good looking numbers of deaths [although that surely would be nice] because death counts are more a result of local tactical conditions rather than overall strategic conditions. The point was to stabilize the place so a government could take root. It hasn’t. So the surge failed.
The notion that there will be some troop reductions next year because of the surge’s “success” is also nonsense. The reductions are coming anyway: the army simply has run out of gas and needs to rotate troops home, whether we’re winning or not. No amount of spin alters that fact.
This whole war was an abomination: it was an evil and unnecessary enterprise foisted on an gullible public by a warmongering cabal of neo-conservative ideologues, none of whom have ever served in the military [don’t forget that Bush ducked national service]. It has killed and maimed hundreds of thousands; it has cost a fortune; it has produced a fertile base for terrorists; and has enhanced to power of Iran. On any strategic assessment it is an unmitigated failure.
Moreover the American public has been totally separated from the pain of war: there has been no tax to finance it; no emergency draft to stock the army with manpower; no cutbacks at home to provide materiel for war; no factories diverted to wartime production; no sacrifice at all. The whole thing has been a national disgrace.
And what did we get?
Nothing.
Except more terrorists; casualties [that Bush doesn’t even have the guts to acknowledge]; debt; lost reputation and world influence; and bitter division at home.
Bush likes to style himself a “wartime” president. What a joke. All he wants to do with this Petraeus report is to punt. His policies have all failed. And rather than stand up and say so, he ducks like the utter coward he has always been. Bush wants to shove this mess onto the next president. He’ll probably succeed.
What an incredible way to run a country. What a mess.
Following up on my posts about the economy, today the Labor Department released its employment survey. The news sent Wall Street into a nose dive. The economy actually shed jobs last month and therefore brought to an end the growth we have had since the past four years. Here is the report via the New York Times:4-Year Growth in Jobs Ends; Stocks Plunge
The bush era has been a bad one in so many ways that it’s hard to recall that his record on the economy was as bad as his record in Iraq. This growth period, measured from the bottom of the last recession [which is the way these things are always done except if you are trying to “spin” a better story!] has seen the worst job generation of any post war recovery. Bush’s record on jobs has been terrible.
And now it seems to sputtering to a halt right at a time when credit markets are in disarray. That’s not a good combination and might well presage a hit to consumer confidence. If it does, and it is looking very likely it will, then a recession surely looms in early 2008.
I have said before the economy looks strong enough to avoid recession, but these employment numbers are a very bad sign: things are looking a lot worse than they were even last week.
Rough times are on there way so button up and don’t take too many financial risks!